🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam decision, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to implement a redrawn congressional district plan that could add up to five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, issued on Thursday, approves a request by the state to lift a federal judge's block that had invalidated the new map in November.

Justices' Rationale

The district court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disrupting the delicate balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in explaining its decision.

The district court had determined that Texas had probably sorted voters by their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the boundaries. It had instructed the state to employ the districts established after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

Through a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She stated that it disregarded the work of the district court, pointing out that its decision was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a breach of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Battle

The ruling comes amid a countrywide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican hold. Usually, redistricting occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that might create several additional Republican-leaning seats. The opposition, in response, have responded with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general hailed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures representation aligned with Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

In contrast, Democratic officials lamented the decision. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A senior House leader said the court had yet again damaged its legitimacy by approving a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.