I championed equal opportunity as the critical to Conservative electoral victory – but Boris Johnson neglected the agenda. See the current state.
While the existentially challenged Tories convenes in its conference city for its yearly gathering, it has much to ponder regarding its next steps. There is uncertainty if a clear direction exists at all. We are in tough times for a political party that now has very little, if anything, fresh or distinctive to say to the electorate.
An Alternate Reality
Things could have turned out vastly better if tangible progress had been made on an policy focus that resonates with people nationwide: Social mobility. Yet the previous administration did not possess the slightest idea on how to convert the trendy talk on levelling up into actual implementation. During the initial period after the 2019 election, it argued over what the concept even meant.
I was perplexed, because I’d already told the Prime Minister what social mobility signified when we first spoke about it during the contest for party leader. The expression was language I created and used at the education ministry to talk about equal opportunity. This became our core mission, and its definition is clear: levelling up is the means by which we realize equality of opportunity – not through reducing chances away from those who are already advantaged, but rather by providing chances to those that are without.
The Core Concept
An additional vital ministry expression we used, “potential is equally shared around the UK, however access isn’t”, represented another a purposeful phrase, embodying the dual components of a social mobility strategy. First, potential shared equally but not nurtured uniformly through our learning institutions. Additionally, opportunities not spread evenly by businesses or our market. Thus, learning and employment were crucial to achieving better life chances. This was an agenda about the social fabric of our country – investing in people’s potential and linking them with prospects.
The Actual Outcome
How did the social mobility agenda evolve into under the previous government? Local investment schemes overseen from the DLUHC. Hanging baskets and redeveloped traffic systems. A government strategy was published almost thirty-six months after the Prime Minister took office, which saw ongoing initiatives rebadged under the fresh social mobility slogan.
As a result, a comprehensive equal opportunity plan went undeveloped, as well as all the reform that it could have inspired – in capital, enterprise, financial planning, tax and in place-making. Additionally, in schooling, including a university system that has become a target for leaders across parties – although it remains the primary vehicle of life improvement for young working-class people, personally, this country has had throughout modern times. Maybe the only engine of equal opportunity, operating at scale.
The Role of Ambition
Ambition is vital for our country to succeed. For people to have aspiration, there needs to be a realistic expectation that effort and reward are related; that if people aspire, they can succeed. For political leadership, being able to foster a sense of optimism about the years ahead is crucial. Analysis by the research body at the university and others, recently released, showed that the education department’s targeted regions I launched while in office – community-focused methods to boosting academic achievement – led to young people in those communities being up to nearly one-fifth more positive about their future than those in comparable communities without these schemes in place. The data shows: just making an sincere effort on pro-social mobility policy can rapidly and effectively change how people perceive their destiny.
Lost Potential
Ignoring this evidence, and in the middle of its post-Johnson leadership contest, in September 2022, the Conservative government terminated the programmes. What reason would someone in those communities vote for a political group that took that action? The opportunity areas policy is a single instance of what might have become a revolutionary Tory policy platform on levelling up, but that possibility was hopelessly squandered. Approaches such as this can inspire hope and aspiration. In contrast, as the Conservatives discovered, reneging on commitments of fair chances is the biggest blunder any political party can make. The electorate held accountable the leadership for its ineffectiveness but, perhaps most of all, for its broken promises on equal opportunity.
Present Circumstances
At present the baton on life chances and fair access has been transferred to a new administration. The previous terminology has been abandoned. Labour has its own policy language of “breaking down the barriers to opportunity”. The organization that is gradually replacing the hapless incumbents, the challenger, also has its own language – “industrial revival”. It’s a phrase to talk about fresh prospects in communities like the one I come from, in my hometown. It promises that an industrial past can revive into an modern manufacturing sector.
For voters, it must feel like a repetitive cycle. Same issue, different language. However, so far, no progress.
Lessons for the Future
Whether the government and opposition want to prevent the identical outcome, each group should learn from the Conservatives’ failure on levelling up; that fair chance language is simple terminology, but successful delivery of improved opportunities is significantly more difficult. Our nation’s chronically poor equal opportunity remains the primary challenge for our country, with the next generation unable to get a proper professional launch, those putting in effort in occupations with few results after the housing costs are covered, and people across the country without any actual expectation their next generation will be able to do any better in life than they have.
Politicians can mention equal chances as much as they want. But where is the organization that has the thorough strategy on equal opportunity? None appear to exist. Whichever party succeeds initially, wins. Not only for their organization, but, significantly, for a entire nation that has urgently needs fair chances so urgently.