🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts about that remarks made by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's victory over the American player during the New York major last eight. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions often encourage patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment would have been understandable. Rather, Fowler invoked the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, myself included. But really. Even if Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, force of nature the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven major titles (plus Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He stated in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact liked his path, because it presented the chance to beat the three best competitors in the world back-to-back. Fritz is more than justified to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final what other person sensibly had the drought of American champions in mind?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing between her and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world starting the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his previous six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that is as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class serve and concussive strength on both front side and reverse side are more than enough to dispose of most opponents on the professional circuit. Against the select few generational talents, however, Fritz is often helpless. The last several years has seen the curious rise of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless move around with the alarming quickness and grace of much shorter players. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a pretty severe limitation on his potential.

The American has achieved a several dramatic, unexpected advancements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. Two years after, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly exploded to fourth place – and held the spot. But the next leap, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing slump of American men lifting major titles when he had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best run to the Wimbledon last four in July.

Fritz’s play in that very last eight match should have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four rounds, a win that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American earning plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after break point, extending the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz finally did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible game to drop serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and compelled him to expend excessive energy to win it. Facing match points in the last game, his first serve floated to heaven. He extended the match twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a collapse, in my opinion, just a consequence of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was fairly compelling evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of the Serbian, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and never especially appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has acquired sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in media sessions, more so than virtually anyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just say how he feels or the strategy he felt decided a match, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States not produce a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unfair. (Now that Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” the American informed an interviewer in June of claiming a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely unlikely for everybody else. {